Trump 2: Griftnado

via https://sh.itjust.works/post/28661541
via https://sh.itjust.works/post/28661541

 

A day after the election a coworker stood outside my office and exclaimed "They're putting up riot fences in Chicago!" with a palms-up shrug and "just say'in" smirk.

He didn't return later to follow up: "A few hundred people protested. No riots. No attempts to overturn the election, even though a certain candidate was adamant that the result couldn't be trusted..."

I do not know if his media diet puts blinders on reality for him, or if he just wasn't interested in parsing that the precautions taken weren't causally linked to a mandatory riot.

So far I haven't responded to any office banter with my own thoughts on what it means for a self-described aspiring dictator to be given an opportunity to execute on his stream-of-conscious whims. I hope that it stays that way, since I like working with this group in spite of the proudly ignorant hot-takes in the office.


Three weeks since the election and things are already so bad that I can only imagine this guy is solely focused on probing the depths of his party's obsequious deference. The current culmination of which was last week's nomination of a man who's alleged to prey on highschool students to be the nation's Attorney General.

Since the election there's been plenty of ink spilled to process the whys and hows. I've come across a mix of takes and viewpoints, and I want to catalog it here to compare against in the coming years.